<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Bouncing to Disk in Pro Tools LE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestudiofiles.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194</link>
	<description>Helping You Make It Happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 05:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Spade</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-130223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy Spade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 01:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-130223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for vid,i was having trouble bouncing my song your method worked for me thank you......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for vid,i was having trouble bouncing my song your method worked for me thank you&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-16905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 08:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-16905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

I ve been recording guitar on 2 mics, created a stereo track, recorded and when I wanna bounce and choose stereo interleaved I get TWO bounce files - L channel and R channel. How do I manage that its all bounced into ONE file with the stereo quality sustained?

Thanks a lot for suggestion,
Martin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I ve been recording guitar on 2 mics, created a stereo track, recorded and when I wanna bounce and choose stereo interleaved I get TWO bounce files &#8211; L channel and R channel. How do I manage that its all bounced into ONE file with the stereo quality sustained?</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for suggestion,<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConnorSmith</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-14584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ConnorSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-14584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@rob

Yeah, I&#039;d try trashing prefs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rob</p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d try trashing prefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-14583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-14583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No upgrades.  but, are you saying I should trash the preferences?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No upgrades.  but, are you saying I should trash the preferences?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConnorSmith</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-14578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ConnorSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-14578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rob

Have you trashed preferences?  Did you make any recent changes to your system (OS upgrade, PT upgrade, plug-in installs, etc.)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rob</p>
<p>Have you trashed preferences?  Did you make any recent changes to your system (OS upgrade, PT upgrade, plug-in installs, etc.)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob pierce</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-14382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rob pierce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-14382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been bouncing files this way for years.  All of the sudden it won&#039;t bounce my highlighted selection.  It defaults to 00.00 for start and to the end of the longest playing track.  Is there something I can do to get it to only bounce the hightlighted selection?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been bouncing files this way for years.  All of the sudden it won&#8217;t bounce my highlighted selection.  It defaults to 00.00 for start and to the end of the longest playing track.  Is there something I can do to get it to only bounce the hightlighted selection?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConnorSmith</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-12013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ConnorSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-12013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@trapped

I have a rebuttal :) Thanks for the discussion.

It often happens that when programs render a bounce, it takes longer than real time.  I was at Studio DalSegno (Damon&#039;s studio) yesterday working on a mix.  I setup a bounce to disk, and it went approximately 25% slower than real time.  This was on a top-of-the-line Mac Pro, and the mix wasn&#039;t overly complicated.  I&#039;ve had similar experiences in Logic Pro.

Additionally (and IMO more importantly) - I actually prefer to bounce in real time.  You should always, always listen to your mixes, whether its while bouncing or after bouncing.  By monitoring back your bounce in realtime, you can double check to make sure everything is honky-dory.

Finally, other than shooting out mp3&#039;s for client previews, I actually rarely use bounce to disk in any DAW.  I prefer to bus everything to a stereo audio track and record my mixes right into the session.  This allows me to compare mixes/organize/etc.  

Thanks
C]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@trapped</p>
<p>I have a rebuttal <img src="http://thestudiofiles.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" />  Thanks for the discussion.</p>
<p>It often happens that when programs render a bounce, it takes longer than real time.  I was at Studio DalSegno (Damon&#8217;s studio) yesterday working on a mix.  I setup a bounce to disk, and it went approximately 25% slower than real time.  This was on a top-of-the-line Mac Pro, and the mix wasn&#8217;t overly complicated.  I&#8217;ve had similar experiences in Logic Pro.</p>
<p>Additionally (and IMO more importantly) &#8211; I actually prefer to bounce in real time.  You should always, always listen to your mixes, whether its while bouncing or after bouncing.  By monitoring back your bounce in realtime, you can double check to make sure everything is honky-dory.</p>
<p>Finally, other than shooting out mp3&#8242;s for client previews, I actually rarely use bounce to disk in any DAW.  I prefer to bus everything to a stereo audio track and record my mixes right into the session.  This allows me to compare mixes/organize/etc.  </p>
<p>Thanks<br />
C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon Sink</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-12011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Sink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-12011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hello trapped--

We feel your pain ;-)

But remember, Connor is not comparing the Pro Tools (real time) bounce function to other DAWs here. He&#039;s just showing the best way to combine steps (render/bounce and conversion/compression) within the LE functionality. Also, the term &quot;render&quot; might be a little more common for video applications than DAWs--PT, DP and Logic all refer to this as &quot;bouncing&quot; though PT is the only one of those three that makes you wait in real time (at the minimum) to do this &quot;in-the-box&quot; mixing.

Thanks for your detailed comments!

Damon
The Studio Files]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello trapped&#8211;</p>
<p>We feel your pain <img src="http://thestudiofiles.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>But remember, Connor is not comparing the Pro Tools (real time) bounce function to other DAWs here. He&#8217;s just showing the best way to combine steps (render/bounce and conversion/compression) within the LE functionality. Also, the term &#8220;render&#8221; might be a little more common for video applications than DAWs&#8211;PT, DP and Logic all refer to this as &#8220;bouncing&#8221; though PT is the only one of those three that makes you wait in real time (at the minimum) to do this &#8220;in-the-box&#8221; mixing.</p>
<p>Thanks for your detailed comments!</p>
<p>Damon<br />
The Studio Files</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trapped in PT land</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-12006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trapped in PT land]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-12006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all due respect, I take exception with the statement &quot;Bouncing to disk is one of the faster ways to export your mix in a variety of formats...&quot;

In fact, &quot;rendering&quot; to disk, as provided by many other software packages (in the audio realm and others) is The Fastest way to export.  The implied definition of &quot;render&quot; and corresponding distinction being: a &quot;render&quot; will perform (and complete) as fast as your machine will allow, whereas Pro Tools&#039; &quot;bounce to disk&quot; works only in realtime. You reinforce my point 2 sentences later with your statement &quot;Pro Tools bounces in real time, so if I selected the whole song, this would be a long video…&quot;

In many cases, especially with modern CPUs, a simple render can be completed much faster than realtime.  Only once a mix has become highly detailed (read: laden with plugins!) does rendering time approach realtime.  (Keeping in mind we are only talking about &quot;LE&quot;, non-hardware-accelerated versions here...)

As for the &quot;variety of formats&quot; phrase, I won&#039;t delve into great detail picking that aspect of your statement apart, but rest assured, if you need to &quot;bounce to disk&quot; in a &quot;variety of formats&quot;, you will be waiting the full (agonizing) realtime duration for each format&#039;s export to complete.

I go to the lengths of pointing this out because this is one of the essential functional areas in which Pro Tools trails the pack, and needs to improve.  This shortcoming literally (and needlessly) wastes the user&#039;s valuable time.

Other than that, kind thanks for taking the time to provide this instructional material!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect, I take exception with the statement &#8220;Bouncing to disk is one of the faster ways to export your mix in a variety of formats&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>In fact, &#8220;rendering&#8221; to disk, as provided by many other software packages (in the audio realm and others) is The Fastest way to export.  The implied definition of &#8220;render&#8221; and corresponding distinction being: a &#8220;render&#8221; will perform (and complete) as fast as your machine will allow, whereas Pro Tools&#8217; &#8220;bounce to disk&#8221; works only in realtime. You reinforce my point 2 sentences later with your statement &#8220;Pro Tools bounces in real time, so if I selected the whole song, this would be a long video…&#8221;</p>
<p>In many cases, especially with modern CPUs, a simple render can be completed much faster than realtime.  Only once a mix has become highly detailed (read: laden with plugins!) does rendering time approach realtime.  (Keeping in mind we are only talking about &#8220;LE&#8221;, non-hardware-accelerated versions here&#8230;)</p>
<p>As for the &#8220;variety of formats&#8221; phrase, I won&#8217;t delve into great detail picking that aspect of your statement apart, but rest assured, if you need to &#8220;bounce to disk&#8221; in a &#8220;variety of formats&#8221;, you will be waiting the full (agonizing) realtime duration for each format&#8217;s export to complete.</p>
<p>I go to the lengths of pointing this out because this is one of the essential functional areas in which Pro Tools trails the pack, and needs to improve.  This shortcoming literally (and needlessly) wastes the user&#8217;s valuable time.</p>
<p>Other than that, kind thanks for taking the time to provide this instructional material!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConnorSmith</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-11240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ConnorSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-11240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@merrilee
Do you have timeline and edit selections linked?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@merrilee<br />
Do you have timeline and edit selections linked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merrilee</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-10672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[merrilee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-10672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HELP!!!!  I am building a huge orchestral track and have it all as one file (2 1/2 hours long!)  I need to bounce to disk one song at a time.  I highlight the part I want bounced and go through the rest of the process but when I push bounce it tries to bounce the whole track (2 1/2 hours) not just the part I have selected and highlighted.  What am I doing wrong???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HELP!!!!  I am building a huge orchestral track and have it all as one file (2 1/2 hours long!)  I need to bounce to disk one song at a time.  I highlight the part I want bounced and go through the rest of the process but when I push bounce it tries to bounce the whole track (2 1/2 hours) not just the part I have selected and highlighted.  What am I doing wrong???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConnorSmith</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ConnorSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-6597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Chester 

Howdy - first off, can you read this post and give us a little more information - http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=848
Its much easy to troubleshoot with that info.

Have you double checked the &quot;Bounce Source&quot; in the bounce-to-disk dialog box?  Did you verify that the main output of your session matches that, and that those tracks are active and non-muted?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chester </p>
<p>Howdy &#8211; first off, can you read this post and give us a little more information &#8211; <a href="http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=848" rel="nofollow">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=848</a><br />
Its much easy to troubleshoot with that info.</p>
<p>Have you double checked the &#8220;Bounce Source&#8221; in the bounce-to-disk dialog box?  Did you verify that the main output of your session matches that, and that those tracks are active and non-muted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHester Henry</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CHester Henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-6595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEED TO KNOW HOW TO RESTORE THE BOUCE TO ANOTHER COMPUTER. FILE COMES UP WITH NO AUDIO FROM WAVE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEED TO KNOW HOW TO RESTORE THE BOUCE TO ANOTHER COMPUTER. FILE COMES UP WITH NO AUDIO FROM WAVE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConnorSmith</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ConnorSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-2706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No problem, glad it helped!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, glad it helped!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Yang</title>
		<link>http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194&#038;cpage=1#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Yang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=194#comment-2699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, this was awesome, bouncing in protools LE has been frustrating for 3 years and your video made it easy.

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, this was awesome, bouncing in protools LE has been frustrating for 3 years and your video made it easy.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
