<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro Tools 9 (HD Native) Performance Test</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thestudiofiles.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987</link>
	<description>Helping You Make It Happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:29:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ???? + 169.61 USDT - graph.org/BALANCE-3682444-USD-04-21-3?hs=4316d031408b73d1bda1c7ee1eedec06&#38; ????</title>
		<link>https://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987&#038;cpage=1#comment-294543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[???? + 169.61 USDT - graph.org/BALANCE-3682444-USD-04-21-3?hs=4316d031408b73d1bda1c7ee1eedec06&#38; ????]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987#comment-294543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8m8qqe]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8m8qqe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flauzio82</title>
		<link>https://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987&#038;cpage=1#comment-42587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flauzio82]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987#comment-42587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hello all

in August last year I purchased the Pro Tools HD Native 9.05. So far everything went well. The only thing I lament is the fact that it can not record with 32 and 64 samples buffersize. both during recording and playback have several peaks, and it is practically impossible Work it. If the port invecie buffersize to 128 or more, the system does not crash but I have the latency problem. Someone happened?

p.s. I&#039;m using a mac pro quad-core intel xeon 2.66Ghz &amp; 3GB Ram memory   mac os 10.6.4.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello all</p>
<p>in August last year I purchased the Pro Tools HD Native 9.05. So far everything went well. The only thing I lament is the fact that it can not record with 32 and 64 samples buffersize. both during recording and playback have several peaks, and it is practically impossible Work it. If the port invecie buffersize to 128 or more, the system does not crash but I have the latency problem. Someone happened?</p>
<p>p.s. I&#8217;m using a mac pro quad-core intel xeon 2.66Ghz &amp; 3GB Ram memory   mac os 10.6.4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avid Pro Tools HD Native: Confused? &#124; Santisound, Inc</title>
		<link>https://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987&#038;cpage=1#comment-37683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avid Pro Tools HD Native: Confused? &#124; Santisound, Inc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987#comment-37683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] more references check out these reviews, Sound on Sound, Audio Fanzine, and Mix Blog. The Studio Files blog has a very in depth performance review, check it out. In March, Kevin Becka at Mix had an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more references check out these reviews, Sound on Sound, Audio Fanzine, and Mix Blog. The Studio Files blog has a very in depth performance review, check it out. In March, Kevin Becka at Mix had an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>https://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987&#038;cpage=1#comment-31350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987#comment-31350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello im running pro tools 9 on a new Mac book pro 15 inch quad core 2.2. With 8gigs of ram. What would be the best engine playback setting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello im running pro tools 9 on a new Mac book pro 15 inch quad core 2.2. With 8gigs of ram. What would be the best engine playback setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Studio Files &#187; Review: Avid Pro Tools HD Native 9</title>
		<link>https://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987&#038;cpage=1#comment-23966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Studio Files &#187; Review: Avid Pro Tools HD Native 9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestudiofiles.com/?p=987#comment-23966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] EDIT: Head over to the new review post HERE where I do a more controlled benchmarking test of Pro T...Right here, I was sold on the power and features of HD Native, especially since I was at one of the lowest buffer settings for a huge mix.  While it probably wouldn&#8217;t work at a or post house or studio requiring bigger counts (as those situations could require far more computer resources, much larger I/O, ability to track larger numbers during mixdown, etc.), from a small to mid-sized music studio&#8217;s perspective, this is the holy grail. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EDIT: Head over to the new review post HERE where I do a more controlled benchmarking test of Pro T&#8230;Right here, I was sold on the power and features of HD Native, especially since I was at one of the lowest buffer settings for a huge mix.  While it probably wouldn&#8217;t work at a or post house or studio requiring bigger counts (as those situations could require far more computer resources, much larger I/O, ability to track larger numbers during mixdown, etc.), from a small to mid-sized music studio&#8217;s perspective, this is the holy grail. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
